As noted in the
Principles
of Accreditation: Foundations for Quality Enhancement, 2012 Edition, the process for initial
and continued accreditation involves a collective analysis and judgment by the institution's
internal constituencies, an informed review by peers external to the institution, and a reasoned
decision by the elected members of the Commission on Colleges Board of Trustees.
Accredited institutions periodically conduct internal reviews involving their
administrative officers, staffs, faculties, students, trustees, and others appropriate to the
process. The internal review allows an institution to consider its effectiveness in achieving its
stated mission, its compliance with the Commission's accreditation requirements, its efforts in
enhancing the quality of student learning and the quality of programs and services offered to its
constituencies, and its success in accomplishing its mission. At the culmination of the internal
review, peer evaluators representing the Commission apply their professional judgment through a
preliminary assessment of the institution; elected Board Members make the final determination of
an institution's compliance with the accreditation requirements.
Overview of the Reaffirmation Process
Preparation of Compliance Certification by University
Preparation of Quality Enhancement Plan by University
Off-Site Review by Peer Evaluators
Preparation of Focused Report (optional) in response to issues affecting compliance identified in
the off-site review
On-Site Review by Peer Evaluators
Final determination by Commission Board members of compliance
|